I found the peer review very useful. My peers were very specific on what I needed to fix in my paper. It helped me see things that could use improvement that I didn't at first. There wasn't anything I disliked about it. The reviews were also better to have on the blog under my first draft, so I could be able to look back at them and then see where specifically the review was talking about in the paper.
I was very happy we were able to have a conference with the instructor. This helped me get a better idea on what I should have in my paper. I found it extremely helpful to learn how to format my paper correctly during the conference and get the paper emailed back to me after it was fixed. I also found the side comments helped give good feedback on areas in my paper I needed to change. Overall, I found this to be the best way for me to fix my mistakes correctly and to learn how to create a well written paper. The only thing I disliked was the conflicting time schedule with other student's conferences and my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment